What can available randomised controlled trials evaluating monitoring strategies tell us about the design and analysis of future trials?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of monitoring regimes present unique challenges. Trials of monitoring evaluate a strategy, “a planned and organised system of repeated assessments and subsequent decisions about additional interventions, such as starting, stopping or modifying treatment” [1] all of which should be specified in advance, and ideally supported by previous research. The complexity of the intervention and consequent potential for “interactions between tests, repeated tests, test results and the decisions based on these results” [1] also necessitates large sample sizes in order to detect an effect on important patient outcomes.
منابع مشابه
Integration of subclassification strategies in randomised controlled clinical trials evaluating manual therapy treatment and exercise therapy for non-specific chronic low back pain: a systematic review.
BACKGROUND There is lack of evidence for specific treatment interventions for patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) despite the substantial amount of randomised controlled clinical trials evaluating treatment outcome for this disorder. HYPOTHESIS It has been hypothesised that this vacuum of evidence is caused by the lack of subclassification of the heterogeneous population...
متن کاملEvaluation of Clinical Trials
In a number of important clinical issues such as evaluation of the efficacy or effectiveness of therapeutic or preventive interventions as well as for comparing the harms of interventions, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide the highest levels of evidence, either directly or indirectly. It is obvious that critical appraisal of these studies to assess their validity and precision is of p...
متن کاملThe STAR*D trial: the 300 lb gorilla is in the room, but does it block all the light?
It cost US tax payers $35 million and the results were announced on the front page of the Washington Post—so what did the STAR*D trial tell us about how to help people presenting with depression? First the name, STAR*D stands for Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression. The emphasis in STAR*D was that it was a series of pragmatic trials that as closely as possible replicated what...
متن کاملدرماتولوژی مبتنی بر شواهد: گزارش درست مقایسهی پیامدها در کارآزماییهای بالینی
According to evidence-based medicine, randomized controlled clinical trials are a group of research designs which provides the highest level of clinical evidence, particularly regarding therapeutic or preventive interventions. Considering the dramatic increase in the number of published clinical trials in medical journals, the readership need to have knowledge about the problems that may occur ...
متن کامل"Why don't they just tell me straight, why allocate it?" The struggle to make sense of participating in a randomised controlled trial.
Randomised controlled trials are the acknowledged 'gold standard' method of evaluating the effectiveness of treatments, but little is known about how and why patients decide to participate in trials nor how much they understand about trial design. In this study, in-depth, semi-structured interviews were carried out with 33 middle aged and older men with lower urinary tract symptoms related to b...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 12 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2011